Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 08:26
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What are some reasons why men may not want to date a woman who can pay her own bills?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
‘Black Swan Event’ Could Trigger 25% Drop in Alphabet Stock, Warns Barclays - TipRanks
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Talent show: Mocking out the first round of the NBA Draft - Chicago Sun-Times
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Epic Effort to Ground Physics in Math Opens Up the Secrets of Time - Quanta Magazine
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Where and how did ballet originate?
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Est sit omnis doloribus placeat rem necessitatibus.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Harvard study says Vitamin D may actually slow down aging - Times of India